human lif Search Results


91
Miltenyi Biotec human lif
Human Lif, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 91/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/human+lif/Human+LIF%2C+research+grade/pm32939092-297-42-67
Average 91 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human lif - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
91/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
MedChemExpress lif

Lif, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/human+lif/LIF%2C+Human/pmc09468384-49-0-2
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
lif - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
R&D Systems lif neutralization antibody
A Ectopic <t>LIF</t> expression (left panel) or treatment with rhLIF (right) enhanced lactate production of different breast cancer cell lines analyzed by measuring lactate levels in the medium using a lactate assay kit. B LIF <t>neutralization</t> antibody (LIF neu-ab) blocked the promoting effect of LIF on lactate production in MCF7, MDA-MB 231 and T47D cells. C Knockdown of endogenous LIF decreased lactate production in MDA-MB 231 cells. D , E Ectopic LIF expression enhanced glycolysis rates ( D ), whereas knockdown of endogenous LIF decreased glycolysis rates ( E ) in different breast cancer cell lines as calculated by ECAR measured by using a Seahorse analyzer. F The diagram of glycolysis. G – I The fold change of inter-metabolites in glycolysis resulted from ectopic LIF expression in MCF7 and MDA-MB 231 cells ( G ), rhLIF treatment in MCF7 cells ( H ) or LIF knockdown in MDA-MB 231 cells ( I ) as determined by LC/MS metabolomics analysis. J The fold change of inter-metabolites in glycolysis induced by ectopic LIF expression in MCF7 xenograft tumors determined by LC/MS metabolomics analysis. Data are presented as mean ± SD ( n = 3/group). * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001; unpaired Student’s t -test.
Lif Neutralization Antibody, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/human+lif/Human+LIF+Antibody/pmc09018736-218-0-7
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
lif neutralization antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

92
R&D Systems recombinant human lif
Fig. 1. Regulation of Uterine IGFBP3 mRNA Expression by <t>LIF</t> <t>Recombinant</t> LIF was injected into one horn and PBS into the other horn of LIF/ females at 84 h of pseudopregnancy (n 10). IGFBP3 mRNA expression levels were determined in total uterine RNA isolated 12 h later by real-time RT-PCR. Values for IGFBP3 are normalized to 18S rRNA for each horn and expressed in arbitrary units relative to the level of the same gene in a standard RNA produced from mouse uterus. LIF treatment (solid bars) produced increased IGFBP3 expression in nine of 10 animals compared with the paired PBS-treated uterine horn (open bars). The mean increase was 2.3-fold and was statistically significant (P 0.02, paired Mann-Whitney).
Recombinant Human Lif, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/human+lif/Recombinant+Human+LIF+Protein%2C+CF/pm15178747-260-7-10
Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
recombinant human lif - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
92/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
R&D Systems human recombinant protein lif 7734 lf
Fig. 1. Regulation of Uterine IGFBP3 mRNA Expression by <t>LIF</t> <t>Recombinant</t> LIF was injected into one horn and PBS into the other horn of LIF/ females at 84 h of pseudopregnancy (n 10). IGFBP3 mRNA expression levels were determined in total uterine RNA isolated 12 h later by real-time RT-PCR. Values for IGFBP3 are normalized to 18S rRNA for each horn and expressed in arbitrary units relative to the level of the same gene in a standard RNA produced from mouse uterus. LIF treatment (solid bars) produced increased IGFBP3 expression in nine of 10 animals compared with the paired PBS-treated uterine horn (open bars). The mean increase was 2.3-fold and was statistically significant (P 0.02, paired Mann-Whitney).
Human Recombinant Protein Lif 7734 Lf, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/human+lif/Recombinant+Human+LIF+Protein/pm38490994-66-0-10
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human recombinant protein lif 7734 lf - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
R&D Systems anti human lif
Fig. 1. Regulation of Uterine IGFBP3 mRNA Expression by <t>LIF</t> <t>Recombinant</t> LIF was injected into one horn and PBS into the other horn of LIF/ females at 84 h of pseudopregnancy (n 10). IGFBP3 mRNA expression levels were determined in total uterine RNA isolated 12 h later by real-time RT-PCR. Values for IGFBP3 are normalized to 18S rRNA for each horn and expressed in arbitrary units relative to the level of the same gene in a standard RNA produced from mouse uterus. LIF treatment (solid bars) produced increased IGFBP3 expression in nine of 10 animals compared with the paired PBS-treated uterine horn (open bars). The mean increase was 2.3-fold and was statistically significant (P 0.02, paired Mann-Whitney).
Anti Human Lif, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/human+lif/Human+LIF+Antibody/pmc12577326-119-4-6
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti human lif - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
R&D Systems human lif quantikine elisa kit
Fig. 1. Regulation of Uterine IGFBP3 mRNA Expression by <t>LIF</t> <t>Recombinant</t> LIF was injected into one horn and PBS into the other horn of LIF/ females at 84 h of pseudopregnancy (n 10). IGFBP3 mRNA expression levels were determined in total uterine RNA isolated 12 h later by real-time RT-PCR. Values for IGFBP3 are normalized to 18S rRNA for each horn and expressed in arbitrary units relative to the level of the same gene in a standard RNA produced from mouse uterus. LIF treatment (solid bars) produced increased IGFBP3 expression in nine of 10 animals compared with the paired PBS-treated uterine horn (open bars). The mean increase was 2.3-fold and was statistically significant (P 0.02, paired Mann-Whitney).
Human Lif Quantikine Elisa Kit, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/human+lif/Human+LIF+Quantikine+ELISA+Kit/pmc12649050-49-6-12
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human lif quantikine elisa kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

88
R&D Systems polyclonal goat antibody against human lif
Fig. 1. Regulation of Uterine IGFBP3 mRNA Expression by <t>LIF</t> <t>Recombinant</t> LIF was injected into one horn and PBS into the other horn of LIF/ females at 84 h of pseudopregnancy (n 10). IGFBP3 mRNA expression levels were determined in total uterine RNA isolated 12 h later by real-time RT-PCR. Values for IGFBP3 are normalized to 18S rRNA for each horn and expressed in arbitrary units relative to the level of the same gene in a standard RNA produced from mouse uterus. LIF treatment (solid bars) produced increased IGFBP3 expression in nine of 10 animals compared with the paired PBS-treated uterine horn (open bars). The mean increase was 2.3-fold and was statistically significant (P 0.02, paired Mann-Whitney).
Polyclonal Goat Antibody Against Human Lif, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 88/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/human+lif/Human+LIF+Biotinylated+Antibody/pm12620495-80-0-6
Average 88 stars, based on 1 article reviews
polyclonal goat antibody against human lif - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
88/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
R&D Systems human lif elisa kit
Figure 4. Correlation across assays of 200 selected compounds from HTS. (A) <t>LIF</t> production activation fold in U87-MG cells, AlphaScreen vs. <t>ELISA</t> (r2 = 0.753). (B) LIF production activation fold in AlphaScreen assay format, U87-MG vs. WM-115 cells (r2 = 0.347). Shape by chemical clustering: circles, cluster 3; squares, cluster 5; triangle, other cluster.
Human Lif Elisa Kit, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/human+lif/Human+LIF+ELISA+Kit+(Colorimetric)/pm26984928-30-0-22
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human lif elisa kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
MedChemExpress eukemia inhibitory factor
Figure 4. Correlation across assays of 200 selected compounds from HTS. (A) <t>LIF</t> production activation fold in U87-MG cells, AlphaScreen vs. <t>ELISA</t> (r2 = 0.753). (B) LIF production activation fold in AlphaScreen assay format, U87-MG vs. WM-115 cells (r2 = 0.347). Shape by chemical clustering: circles, cluster 3; squares, cluster 5; triangle, other cluster.
Eukemia Inhibitory Factor, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/human+lif/LIF%2C+Human/pm41972409-227-27-31
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
eukemia inhibitory factor - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
R&D Systems human lif
Figure 4. Correlation across assays of 200 selected compounds from HTS. (A) <t>LIF</t> production activation fold in U87-MG cells, AlphaScreen vs. <t>ELISA</t> (r2 = 0.753). (B) LIF production activation fold in AlphaScreen assay format, U87-MG vs. WM-115 cells (r2 = 0.347). Shape by chemical clustering: circles, cluster 3; squares, cluster 5; triangle, other cluster.
Human Lif, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/human+lif/Human+LIF+Antibody/pm12574225-62-32-36
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human lif - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
R&D Systems lif neutralizing antibody
( A ) Heatmap of cell viability after 5 days’ treatment with 1 μmol/L of each single agent (rows) per various lung cancer cell lines (columns) relative to DMSO control. Commercially available agents used are in . ( B ) Bar graph of IC 50 values of various indicated lung cancer cell lines in response to trametinib. IC 50 of NE and non-NE tSCLC cell lines is shown in red and blue, respectively. ( C ) Dose-response curve of trametinib in tSCLC cell lines (blue: NE, red: non-NE). Cell viability was assessed by CTG after 120 hours ( n = 6, technical replicate, mean ± SD). ( D ) NE tSCLC cell viability was assayed by CTG following treatment with indicated concentration of <t>LIF</t> and IL-6 for 5 days. ( E ) qPCR analysis of LIF mRNA expression levels in non-NE tSCLC cell lines treated with 10 nmol/L trametinib 2 and 6 hours. Gene expression was normalized to GUSB and shown as relative to that of DMSO-treated control ( n = 3, technical replicate, mean ± SD). ****= P ≤ 0.001 by 2-way ANOVA with Šídák’s multiple comparisons test. ( F ) Various cell lines were analyzed for LIF expression by ELISA. Data are presented as mean ± SD ( n = 3. Technical replicates). ( G ) GFP-expressing DFCI112F and DFCI190F cells were incubated with CM from their corresponding adherent cell line pairs pretreated with either LIF <t>neutralizing</t> antibody (500 ng/mL) or control IgG and monitored in real time via IncuCyte imager for green fluorescence intensity. ( H and I ) GFP expressing DFCI112F ( H ) and DFCI190 ( I ) cells were incubated with CM from their adherent cell line pairs pretreated with siRNA against LIF or unrelated sequence and monitored via IncuCyte imager. LIF knockdown efficiency was tested using ELISA ( n = 3, technical replicate, mean ± SD). ( J ) The schema illustrating the interaction between NE and non-NE tSCLC cells through LIF.
Lif Neutralizing Antibody, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/human+lif/Human+LIF+Antibody/pmc12892894-230-0-15
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
lif neutralizing antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Journal: iScience

Article Title: MCM7 supports the stemness of bladder cancer stem-like cells by enhancing autophagic flux

doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.105029

Figure Lengend Snippet:

Article Snippet: LIF , MedChemExpress , Cat. # HY-P73276.

Techniques: Recombinant, MTS Assay, Protein Concentration, Software

A Ectopic LIF expression (left panel) or treatment with rhLIF (right) enhanced lactate production of different breast cancer cell lines analyzed by measuring lactate levels in the medium using a lactate assay kit. B LIF neutralization antibody (LIF neu-ab) blocked the promoting effect of LIF on lactate production in MCF7, MDA-MB 231 and T47D cells. C Knockdown of endogenous LIF decreased lactate production in MDA-MB 231 cells. D , E Ectopic LIF expression enhanced glycolysis rates ( D ), whereas knockdown of endogenous LIF decreased glycolysis rates ( E ) in different breast cancer cell lines as calculated by ECAR measured by using a Seahorse analyzer. F The diagram of glycolysis. G – I The fold change of inter-metabolites in glycolysis resulted from ectopic LIF expression in MCF7 and MDA-MB 231 cells ( G ), rhLIF treatment in MCF7 cells ( H ) or LIF knockdown in MDA-MB 231 cells ( I ) as determined by LC/MS metabolomics analysis. J The fold change of inter-metabolites in glycolysis induced by ectopic LIF expression in MCF7 xenograft tumors determined by LC/MS metabolomics analysis. Data are presented as mean ± SD ( n = 3/group). * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001; unpaired Student’s t -test.

Journal: Cell Death & Disease

Article Title: Leukemia inhibitory factor drives glucose metabolic reprogramming to promote breast tumorigenesis

doi: 10.1038/s41419-022-04820-x

Figure Lengend Snippet: A Ectopic LIF expression (left panel) or treatment with rhLIF (right) enhanced lactate production of different breast cancer cell lines analyzed by measuring lactate levels in the medium using a lactate assay kit. B LIF neutralization antibody (LIF neu-ab) blocked the promoting effect of LIF on lactate production in MCF7, MDA-MB 231 and T47D cells. C Knockdown of endogenous LIF decreased lactate production in MDA-MB 231 cells. D , E Ectopic LIF expression enhanced glycolysis rates ( D ), whereas knockdown of endogenous LIF decreased glycolysis rates ( E ) in different breast cancer cell lines as calculated by ECAR measured by using a Seahorse analyzer. F The diagram of glycolysis. G – I The fold change of inter-metabolites in glycolysis resulted from ectopic LIF expression in MCF7 and MDA-MB 231 cells ( G ), rhLIF treatment in MCF7 cells ( H ) or LIF knockdown in MDA-MB 231 cells ( I ) as determined by LC/MS metabolomics analysis. J The fold change of inter-metabolites in glycolysis induced by ectopic LIF expression in MCF7 xenograft tumors determined by LC/MS metabolomics analysis. Data are presented as mean ± SD ( n = 3/group). * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001; unpaired Student’s t -test.

Article Snippet: LIF neutralization antibody (AF-250-NA) was purchased from R&D Systems.

Techniques: Expressing, Lactate Assay, Neutralization, Knockdown, Liquid Chromatography with Mass Spectroscopy

A Glut1 mRNA levels were detected by quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) in MCF7, MDA-MB 231, and T47D cells with or without ectopic LIF expression. B , C Ectopic LIF expression ( B ) or rhLIF treatment (100 ng/ml for 12 h) ( C ) promoted endogenous Glut1 PM translocation in MCF7, MDA-MB 231, and T47D cells as determined by Western-blot assays. D Knockdown of LIF decreased endogenous Glut1 PM translocation in MDA-MB 231 cells. E Ectopic LIF expression increased the PM translocation of ectopically expressed Myc-Glut1 in MCF7, MDA-MB 231 and T47D cells as determined by Western-blot assays. F LIF neutralization antibody (LIF neu-ab) largely abolished exogenous Glut1 PM translocation promoted by LIF. G The rhLIF treatment promoted exogenous Glut1 PM translocation in cells. H Knockdown of LIF decreased Myc-Glut1 PM translocation in MDA-MB 231 cells. I Ectopic LIF expression promoted Myc-Glut1 PM translocation (left panels) while knockdown of LIF decreased Myc-Glut1 PM translocation (right panels) in MDA-MB 231 cells as determined by IF staining assays. Scale bar, 10 μm. J Ectopic LIF expression promoted the PM translocation of Myc-Glut1 in MCF7, MDA-MB 231, and T47D cells as determined by flow cytometry assays. Left panels: representative images of flow cytometry analysis. Right panels: quantifications of relative fluorescence intensity of Myc-Glut1 on the cell membrane normalized with total Myc-Glut1 fluorescence intensity in cells. In A , J data are presented as mean ± SD. n = 3/group. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; NS: non-significant; unpaired Student’s t -test. Uncropped Wes t ern-blot images are shown in Supplementary Fig .

Journal: Cell Death & Disease

Article Title: Leukemia inhibitory factor drives glucose metabolic reprogramming to promote breast tumorigenesis

doi: 10.1038/s41419-022-04820-x

Figure Lengend Snippet: A Glut1 mRNA levels were detected by quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) in MCF7, MDA-MB 231, and T47D cells with or without ectopic LIF expression. B , C Ectopic LIF expression ( B ) or rhLIF treatment (100 ng/ml for 12 h) ( C ) promoted endogenous Glut1 PM translocation in MCF7, MDA-MB 231, and T47D cells as determined by Western-blot assays. D Knockdown of LIF decreased endogenous Glut1 PM translocation in MDA-MB 231 cells. E Ectopic LIF expression increased the PM translocation of ectopically expressed Myc-Glut1 in MCF7, MDA-MB 231 and T47D cells as determined by Western-blot assays. F LIF neutralization antibody (LIF neu-ab) largely abolished exogenous Glut1 PM translocation promoted by LIF. G The rhLIF treatment promoted exogenous Glut1 PM translocation in cells. H Knockdown of LIF decreased Myc-Glut1 PM translocation in MDA-MB 231 cells. I Ectopic LIF expression promoted Myc-Glut1 PM translocation (left panels) while knockdown of LIF decreased Myc-Glut1 PM translocation (right panels) in MDA-MB 231 cells as determined by IF staining assays. Scale bar, 10 μm. J Ectopic LIF expression promoted the PM translocation of Myc-Glut1 in MCF7, MDA-MB 231, and T47D cells as determined by flow cytometry assays. Left panels: representative images of flow cytometry analysis. Right panels: quantifications of relative fluorescence intensity of Myc-Glut1 on the cell membrane normalized with total Myc-Glut1 fluorescence intensity in cells. In A , J data are presented as mean ± SD. n = 3/group. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; NS: non-significant; unpaired Student’s t -test. Uncropped Wes t ern-blot images are shown in Supplementary Fig .

Article Snippet: LIF neutralization antibody (AF-250-NA) was purchased from R&D Systems.

Techniques: Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction, Expressing, Translocation Assay, Western Blot, Knockdown, Neutralization, Staining, Flow Cytometry, Fluorescence, Membrane

Fig. 1. Regulation of Uterine IGFBP3 mRNA Expression by LIF Recombinant LIF was injected into one horn and PBS into the other horn of LIF/ females at 84 h of pseudopregnancy (n 10). IGFBP3 mRNA expression levels were determined in total uterine RNA isolated 12 h later by real-time RT-PCR. Values for IGFBP3 are normalized to 18S rRNA for each horn and expressed in arbitrary units relative to the level of the same gene in a standard RNA produced from mouse uterus. LIF treatment (solid bars) produced increased IGFBP3 expression in nine of 10 animals compared with the paired PBS-treated uterine horn (open bars). The mean increase was 2.3-fold and was statistically significant (P 0.02, paired Mann-Whitney).

Journal: Molecular endocrinology (Baltimore, Md.)

Article Title: Identification of genes regulated by leukemia-inhibitory factor in the mouse uterus at the time of implantation.

doi: 10.1210/me.2004-0110

Figure Lengend Snippet: Fig. 1. Regulation of Uterine IGFBP3 mRNA Expression by LIF Recombinant LIF was injected into one horn and PBS into the other horn of LIF/ females at 84 h of pseudopregnancy (n 10). IGFBP3 mRNA expression levels were determined in total uterine RNA isolated 12 h later by real-time RT-PCR. Values for IGFBP3 are normalized to 18S rRNA for each horn and expressed in arbitrary units relative to the level of the same gene in a standard RNA produced from mouse uterus. LIF treatment (solid bars) produced increased IGFBP3 expression in nine of 10 animals compared with the paired PBS-treated uterine horn (open bars). The mean increase was 2.3-fold and was statistically significant (P 0.02, paired Mann-Whitney).

Article Snippet: Two ip injections each of 5 g recombinant human LIF (R&D systems 250-LF) in PBS were given at 0900 h and 1600 h on d 4 of pregnancy, and the animals were allowed to proceed to term.

Techniques: Expressing, Recombinant, Injection, Isolation, Quantitative RT-PCR, Produced, MANN-WHITNEY

Fig. 6. LIF Regulation of Amphiregulin and IRG1 in the Uterus Recombinant LIF was injected into one horn and PBS into the other horn of LIF/ females at 84 h of pseudopreg- nancy (n 10, same animals as shown in Fig. 1). Amphiregu- lin and IRG1 mRNA expression levels were determined in total uterine RNA isolated 12 h later by real-time RT-PCR. Values for each mRNA species are normalized to 18S rRNA for each horn and expressed in arbitrary units relative to the level of the same gene in a standard RNA produced from mouse uterus. LIF treatment (solid bars) increased both am- phiregulin and IRG1 expression in 10 of 10 animals compared with the corresponding PBS-treated horn (open bars). The mean increase for amphiregulin was 7.3-fold and for IRG1 was 3.7-fold and was statistically significant for either gene (P 0.002, paired Mann-Whitney test).

Journal: Molecular endocrinology (Baltimore, Md.)

Article Title: Identification of genes regulated by leukemia-inhibitory factor in the mouse uterus at the time of implantation.

doi: 10.1210/me.2004-0110

Figure Lengend Snippet: Fig. 6. LIF Regulation of Amphiregulin and IRG1 in the Uterus Recombinant LIF was injected into one horn and PBS into the other horn of LIF/ females at 84 h of pseudopreg- nancy (n 10, same animals as shown in Fig. 1). Amphiregu- lin and IRG1 mRNA expression levels were determined in total uterine RNA isolated 12 h later by real-time RT-PCR. Values for each mRNA species are normalized to 18S rRNA for each horn and expressed in arbitrary units relative to the level of the same gene in a standard RNA produced from mouse uterus. LIF treatment (solid bars) increased both am- phiregulin and IRG1 expression in 10 of 10 animals compared with the corresponding PBS-treated horn (open bars). The mean increase for amphiregulin was 7.3-fold and for IRG1 was 3.7-fold and was statistically significant for either gene (P 0.002, paired Mann-Whitney test).

Article Snippet: Two ip injections each of 5 g recombinant human LIF (R&D systems 250-LF) in PBS were given at 0900 h and 1600 h on d 4 of pregnancy, and the animals were allowed to proceed to term.

Techniques: Recombinant, Injection, Expressing, Isolation, Quantitative RT-PCR, Produced, MANN-WHITNEY

Figure 4. Correlation across assays of 200 selected compounds from HTS. (A) LIF production activation fold in U87-MG cells, AlphaScreen vs. ELISA (r2 = 0.753). (B) LIF production activation fold in AlphaScreen assay format, U87-MG vs. WM-115 cells (r2 = 0.347). Shape by chemical clustering: circles, cluster 3; squares, cluster 5; triangle, other cluster.

Journal: Journal of biomolecular screening

Article Title: Discovery of Enhancers of the Secretion of Leukemia Inhibitory Factor for the Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis.

doi: 10.1177/1087057116638821

Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 4. Correlation across assays of 200 selected compounds from HTS. (A) LIF production activation fold in U87-MG cells, AlphaScreen vs. ELISA (r2 = 0.753). (B) LIF production activation fold in AlphaScreen assay format, U87-MG vs. WM-115 cells (r2 = 0.347). Shape by chemical clustering: circles, cluster 3; squares, cluster 5; triangle, other cluster.

Article Snippet: Human LIF ELISA kit, human LIF IgG2B monoclonal antibody from mouse, and biotinylated human LIF IgG polyclonal antibody from goat were from R&D System (Minneapolis, MN).

Techniques: Activation Assay, Amplified Luminescent Proximity Homogenous Assay, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay

( A ) Heatmap of cell viability after 5 days’ treatment with 1 μmol/L of each single agent (rows) per various lung cancer cell lines (columns) relative to DMSO control. Commercially available agents used are in . ( B ) Bar graph of IC 50 values of various indicated lung cancer cell lines in response to trametinib. IC 50 of NE and non-NE tSCLC cell lines is shown in red and blue, respectively. ( C ) Dose-response curve of trametinib in tSCLC cell lines (blue: NE, red: non-NE). Cell viability was assessed by CTG after 120 hours ( n = 6, technical replicate, mean ± SD). ( D ) NE tSCLC cell viability was assayed by CTG following treatment with indicated concentration of LIF and IL-6 for 5 days. ( E ) qPCR analysis of LIF mRNA expression levels in non-NE tSCLC cell lines treated with 10 nmol/L trametinib 2 and 6 hours. Gene expression was normalized to GUSB and shown as relative to that of DMSO-treated control ( n = 3, technical replicate, mean ± SD). ****= P ≤ 0.001 by 2-way ANOVA with Šídák’s multiple comparisons test. ( F ) Various cell lines were analyzed for LIF expression by ELISA. Data are presented as mean ± SD ( n = 3. Technical replicates). ( G ) GFP-expressing DFCI112F and DFCI190F cells were incubated with CM from their corresponding adherent cell line pairs pretreated with either LIF neutralizing antibody (500 ng/mL) or control IgG and monitored in real time via IncuCyte imager for green fluorescence intensity. ( H and I ) GFP expressing DFCI112F ( H ) and DFCI190 ( I ) cells were incubated with CM from their adherent cell line pairs pretreated with siRNA against LIF or unrelated sequence and monitored via IncuCyte imager. LIF knockdown efficiency was tested using ELISA ( n = 3, technical replicate, mean ± SD). ( J ) The schema illustrating the interaction between NE and non-NE tSCLC cells through LIF.

Journal: JCI Insight

Article Title: EGFR -mutant transformed small cell lung cancer harbors intratumoral heterogeneity targetable with MEK inhibitor combination therapy

doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.197008

Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Heatmap of cell viability after 5 days’ treatment with 1 μmol/L of each single agent (rows) per various lung cancer cell lines (columns) relative to DMSO control. Commercially available agents used are in . ( B ) Bar graph of IC 50 values of various indicated lung cancer cell lines in response to trametinib. IC 50 of NE and non-NE tSCLC cell lines is shown in red and blue, respectively. ( C ) Dose-response curve of trametinib in tSCLC cell lines (blue: NE, red: non-NE). Cell viability was assessed by CTG after 120 hours ( n = 6, technical replicate, mean ± SD). ( D ) NE tSCLC cell viability was assayed by CTG following treatment with indicated concentration of LIF and IL-6 for 5 days. ( E ) qPCR analysis of LIF mRNA expression levels in non-NE tSCLC cell lines treated with 10 nmol/L trametinib 2 and 6 hours. Gene expression was normalized to GUSB and shown as relative to that of DMSO-treated control ( n = 3, technical replicate, mean ± SD). ****= P ≤ 0.001 by 2-way ANOVA with Šídák’s multiple comparisons test. ( F ) Various cell lines were analyzed for LIF expression by ELISA. Data are presented as mean ± SD ( n = 3. Technical replicates). ( G ) GFP-expressing DFCI112F and DFCI190F cells were incubated with CM from their corresponding adherent cell line pairs pretreated with either LIF neutralizing antibody (500 ng/mL) or control IgG and monitored in real time via IncuCyte imager for green fluorescence intensity. ( H and I ) GFP expressing DFCI112F ( H ) and DFCI190 ( I ) cells were incubated with CM from their adherent cell line pairs pretreated with siRNA against LIF or unrelated sequence and monitored via IncuCyte imager. LIF knockdown efficiency was tested using ELISA ( n = 3, technical replicate, mean ± SD). ( J ) The schema illustrating the interaction between NE and non-NE tSCLC cells through LIF.

Article Snippet: LIF neutralizing antibody (AF-250-NA), IL-6 neutralizing antibody (AF-206-NA), and control antibody (AB-108-C) were purchased from R&D Systems.

Techniques: Control, Concentration Assay, Expressing, Gene Expression, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Incubation, Fluorescence, Sequencing, Knockdown